New models of iPhones have caught the attention of outdoor enthusiasts with their new feature of sending and receiving satellite signals in case of emergencies. This raises the question of whether these phones can replace traditional satellite communicators offered by Garmin and Spot. For minimalist individuals like myself, the idea of combining two expensive devices into one seems attractive, but is it practical?
Satellite communication devices come in various brands and styles, offering features ranging from simple GPS tracking to advanced two-way communication tools with weather reports. The cost of such devices can range from $100 to $600, with monthly subscriptions ranging from $15 to $200, depending on the desired features.
With the new iPhones, it is possible to make emergency calls and send text messages even when outside cellular network coverage. The phones can also update their location in the “Find My iPhone” app using satellite signals and notify designated contacts in case of activating the alarm function. Many people have already shared stories of how this feature has helped them and others.
Although this sounds ideal for budget-conscious outdoor enthusiasts, concerns remain as to whether the iPhone can fully replace traditional satellite devices. To gather more information, I reached out to social media and asked other outdoor enthusiasts about their experiences with sudden situations using iPhones.
The responses received were helpful, with some users expressing their trust in the capabilities of the iPhone. However, there were also those who preferred traditional satellite devices due to longer battery life, durability, and global network coverage.
It is worth noting that there have been complaints about communication with Apple’s phone center in case of emergencies. Some users felt that the responses were unclear. Additionally, traditional satellite devices also offer the ability to make non-emergency calls.
In conclusion, the new iPhones offer a convenient and potentially cost-saving option for emergency communication in the wilderness, but they seem to be unable to fully replace traditional satellite communicators. Each person should assess their specific needs and preferences to make an informed decision on which device would best suit their outdoor adventures.
Source: [Enter source URL here]
The source of the article is from the blog rugbynews.at