According to a recent government meeting, concerns have emerged regarding potential threats arising from 5G masts. Ian Drew, speaking on behalf of the Eks Residents’ Association, claimed that the installation of 5G masts nationwide is part of a larger plan to create the “Internet of Things” and expressed his belief that 5G poses a threat to humanity and a blight on the landscape.
Andrea Luxford-Vaughan, a member of the Colchester City Council for Planning, Environment, and Sustainable Development, sympathetically responded to Mr. Drew’s claims. She stated that she had worked against the installation of 5G masts near schools and highlighted research suggesting that these masts may potentially harm the internal organs of young people, including their reproductive organs. However, she acknowledged that there is currently no conclusive evidence of harm due to limited exposure time to 5G technology.
Luxford-Vaughan also expressed frustration with planning regulations that often exempt 5G masts from the need for construction permits. She emphasized that local authorities have limitations in this matter and encouraged individuals to voice their concerns to the government.
Contrary to the claims made during the meeting, the World Health Organization has stated that no negative health effects have been observed with exposure to wireless technologies, including 5G networks. The organization emphasizes that exposure to 5G infrastructure with frequencies around 3.5 GHz is comparable to existing mobile phone base stations.
Gazetta approached Luxford-Vaughan to clarify her earlier remarks regarding the potential harm of 5G masts. Luxford-Vaughan distanced herself from those claims, stating that the scientific consensus on this matter is still uncertain. She stressed that there are differing opinions among qualified professionals who suggest potential health effects within a specific range of radiation exposure.
It is worth noting that the Colchester City Council clarified that the views expressed by Luxford-Vaughan and Mr. Drew are not endorsed by the council. Other council members, including David King, council leader, emphasized that the council does not oppose 5G technology and conspiracy theories should not be taken seriously.
While concerns and debates regarding potential risks associated with 5G technology persist, the scientific consensus and regulatory organizations, such as the World Health Organization, maintain that there is currently no conclusive evidence linking 5G networks to negative health effects.
The source of the article is from the blog scimag.news